Sorry, this entry is only available in Swedish.
Data retention and the data retention directive didn’t become a huge success in the EU — 10 out of 28 member states have already nullified the effects of the directive in national legislation or didn’t implement it in the first place. See the full list and read more here!
During the Almedalen week a number of articles about the Swedish company NetClean were published in the daily press. Public radio SR P3 brought up the problem and DFRI participated. Furthermore, we found out that NetClean already have the Egyptian government as customers. Despite the extensive censorship that takes place in the country NetClean claim that their equipment does not contribute to the censorship. NetClean also claims that the equipment is “locked” and can not be used for other content than what’s on the revocation lists from IWF (Internet Watch Foundation).
NetClean have in a blog post said that Whitebox (the product that performs censorship on the network operator level) is located in approximately 20 countries. DFRI is still awaiting the response to the open letter we sent last week.
Despite the criticism, it is unlikely that a deal of this magnitude can be stopped in the first place. DFRI continues to work on the issue. For those who want to help us and wonder what they can do, a good first step is to inform themselves more about the subject. The only Swedish research on internet filtering has been done by Marie Eneman at the University of Gothenburg. In an interview with NetClean CEO one can read:
Christian Berg refers to Marie Eneman at Chalmers research on filtering of the internet and wrote a thesis which, among other things, is about overblocking – to mistakenly include too much on the list.
– She came to the conclusion that there was no problem, he says.
– I did not at all, says Marie Eneman.
Journalist Anders R Olsson has also written a book about filtering which can be downloaded for free. DFRI’s European partner organization EDRi published in 2010 a blocking booklet. It is in English but is easy to understand. However, it has no information about what happened after 2010, such as court cases, etc.